Pyle you had best square your ass away and start sh-tting me Tiffany cufflinks or I will definitely f-ck you up!” 6. Hartman: “That’s enough! Get on your feet. Hartman: “You goddamn communist heathen, you had best sound off that you love the Virgin Mary, or I’m gonna stomp your guts out! Now you DO love the Virgin Mary, don’t you?” 5. Hartman: “I bet you’re the kind of guy that would f-ck a person in the ass and not even have the goddamn common courtesy to give him a reach-around. The director seemed to try to recreate some of the famous photos from the LZ-Xray battle that i have seen, a few that come to mind were the pile of M16s and web gear and the Hollywood "gun people" even went to the trouble of putting 3 prong F/H, solid no butt trap stocks on and spray paint the bolt carriers silver to simulate the real hard chrome of the early M16's used in the real battle.Īs far as the M60's.they were close but a real anal retentive Vietnam gun buff would point out on the M60's used in the LZ-Xray battle had Magazine brackets on them INSTEAD of Bandoleer hangers,and had a 6 piece barrel lock instead of the 4 piece that were in the film also the correct period M60's had sling swivels located on the bottom of the butt stock and forearm also the forearms had a hole in the center of hand swell for a Helicopter /vehicle mount that later m60 forearms did not have.3. In the US area the m-60's are correct I have paid little attnetion to the m-16's though please enlighten me. I'm fairly certain you're refering to the P-47 Thunderbolt, but both the P-47 and P-51 could and were used in fighter-bomber roles, and both could have been used for "tank busting." Not for nothing, I agree, it's not always feasible to make a 100% accurate movie, but while we're nitpicking, I'm pretty sure you didn't mean "P-41," considering that the P-41 is an early war aircraft, and not a very prolific one at that, IIRC, it was limited to a couple of prototypes. Give the film folks a break, ok? They tried really hard and got the story pretty much dead on. But it is impossible to recreate a historical setting without getting something wrong, even if you had an unlimited budget. I'm not saying that what you observed wasn't accurate nor that it wasn't a problem. So having a bunch of Yanks running around with rifles could have made the film board kind of nervous.
FULL METAL JACKET MOVIE FIREARMS MOVIE
England is not, and was not then, particularly "gun friendly," in spite of having a huge movie industry that makes tons of "shoot 'em up" films. There's also the issue of what's allowed where you're filming. But Speilberg couldn't GET a P41, so he settled for a genuine WWII plane. For example, in Saving Private Ryan, they used a Mustang to bomb the tank in the final battle scene. There's this thing called "cost" involved in all sorts of filmmaking decisions. There are a lot of movies that have supposedly well qualified technical advisors that the producers listen to, nod politely, and then do whatever the hell they were going to do anyway.
![full metal jacket movie firearms full metal jacket movie firearms](https://www.looper.com/img/gallery/times-full-metal-jacket-got-history-all-wrong/inaccurate-weapons-1648683640.jpg)
Obvious English refinery town with palm trees used as Hue, Vietnam.Īctors who look like they are in their 30s playing 18,19 year olds. Obvious Bell Jet Ranger shadow over supposed Vietnam.įastened chip straps on helmets (unusual). Marines using Korean War m41 tanks (should be ARVN) M16's with no forward assists, blank guns, etc? Helicopter door gunner wearing tanker helmet?Īll the Marines wearing 3/4 collar US Army flak jackets during Tet '68? Here are some errors I wish could have been fixed. Lee Ermey's a cool dude but sucks as a technical advisor.